Boyles v. Freeman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiff sued defendant, Robert Freeman, to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained as a result of defendant’s negligent operation of his automobile. A bench trial resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $20,000. Plaintiff instituted this supplementary action to garnish Freeman’s funds or property aUegedly held by defendant-garnishee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. by reason of it having issued Freeman an insurance policy providing him coverage for bodily injuries in the amount of $10,000. This appeal is taken from the entry of a judgment in favor…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Livingston & Gilchrist v. Maryland InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Phenix Insurance v. StocksIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Andes Insurance v. FishIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Royal Neighbors of America v. BomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. TomasunIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sierens v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Meier v. Aetna Life & Casualty Standard Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Mollihan v. StephanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Hatch v. Woodmen Accident & Life Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Marionjoy Rehabilitation Hospital v. LoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.