Essling's Homes Plus, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant City of Saint Paul (“the City”) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court heard oral argument on September 8, 2004. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The Court shall grant summary judgment as to the dismissal of Plaintiffs Judith Essling and Bridget Essling, but it denies the remainder of Defendant’s motion.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This suit involves two properties in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Salau v. DentonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015
- Streambend Properties III, LLC v. Sexton Lofts, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NE v. City of LincolnDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2007
- Groteboer v. Eyota Economic Development AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Spine Imaging MRI, L.L.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.