DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NE v. City of Lincoln
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KOPF, District Judge.
Evidence showing heaps of red tape, garnished with bureaucratic indifference and inconsistent and irrelevant posturing by city officials, elected and otherwise, does not make the City of Lincoln guilty of consciously intending to discriminate against people with developmental disabilities. But that evidence, and more, does prove that Lincoln denied a group home provider and its developmentally disabled clients reasonable accommodations to land-use requirements. As a result, taxpayers will have to pay the provider a lot of money for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wisconsin Community Services, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Kelvin D. Peebles v. John E. Potter, 1 Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. United States of America v. City of Taylor, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Hemisphere Building Company, Inc. v. Village of Richton ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilkison v. City of ArapahoeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Groteboer v. Eyota Economic Development AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Doll v. Trellis Walnut Towers LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Michel-Wiggins v. Jes Holdings LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
- Wilkison v. City of ArapahoeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.