Legal Opinion

Minnesota Muskies, Inc. v. Hudson

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1969No. C-72-G-68PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OPINION

EDWIN M. STANLEY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs seek by this action to enjoin the defendant, Louis C. Hudson, from playing professional basketball for any professional basketball team other than the plaintiff, Florida Professional Sports, Inc., for the term of an alleged contract he signed with the plaintiff, Minnesota Muskies, Inc., on May 3, 1967, and assigned to the plaintiff, Florida Professional Sports, Inc., on July 31, 1968. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and the amount in controversy.

The matter has been submitted to this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Boston Celtics Limited Partnership v. Brian ShawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Washington Capitols Basketball Club, Inc. v. BarryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Company v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. v. BergeyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API