Legal Opinion

Nida v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 2004No. 99,969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion By

CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge.

1 Appellant, Jerry R. Nida (Nida), appeals from the trial court's judgment affirming the order of Appellee, Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees (OPERS), which order approved temporary forfeiture of a portion of Nida's retirement benefits. We hold the trial court acted correctly and affirm.

T2 Nida began participation in OPERS in 1974 when he became an employee of the Oklahoma Department of Health. - Nida eventually became the Commissioner of Health, a position from which he resigned in May 2000. He began receiving his retirement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Berry v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. STATE EX REL. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF OKL. PUB. EMP. RETIR. SYS.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Opinion No. (2007), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2007
  3. Opinion No. (2008), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2008
  4. Opinion No. 07-16 (2007), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API