Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided June 26, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask the following questions:

1. May a county employ a person who has been convicted of a felony andis still serving any portion of a probationary sentence imposed for suchconviction, whether the sentence is deferred, suspended orotherwise? 2. May a county employ a person who has been convicted of a felonyprior to his or her employment and has served and completed the entiresentence imposed by the court for such conviction?

¶ 1 Your questions indicate that you are specifically concerned about the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Alfalfa Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API