Legal Opinion

Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Secura Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1993No. C7-92-2057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellants Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Rotation) and James Lorence commenced this action against respondent Secura Insurance Company asserting entitlement to insurance benefits as a result of a vehicle accident. Lorence sought wage loss benefits; Rotation sought to assert a subrogation right for salary paid to Lorence. Secura moved for summary judgment, asserting Lorence had failed to establish he actually lost any wages and that Rotation had no subrogation right. The trial court granted Secu-ra’s motion. Lorence appealed. Rotation is not pursuing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Hopkins Ex Rel. LaFontaine v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Erickson v. Great American Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Great West Casualty Co. v. KroningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Roquemore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Neutgens v. Westfield GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API