Legal Opinion
Higgason v. Stogsdill
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 2004No. 77A01-0403-CV-126PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
James H. Higgason, pro se, appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of all the defendants in the latest of what has become a steady stream of civil rights lawsuits filed from prison by Higgason. Those defendants, namely, Chris Stogsdill, Art Davis, Dave Thomson, Michelle Shake, and Lee Hoefling (collectively referred to as the Defendants), were employees at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility (the WVCF). Upon appeal, Higgason challenges the grant of summary judgment.
We affirm.
The relevant facts are brief. On September 19, 2000, while incarcerated in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kellogg v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Reeder v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Baker v. RolnickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Albuquerque Commons P'ship v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Chuck W. Adams, Charles E. Howard v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Kimberly Earl, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerry Earl v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Sarah Smith VinnedgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.