Legal Opinion

Cheff v. Mathes

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 17, 1964PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, Justice.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Vice-Chancellor in a derivative suit' holding certain directors of Holland *497Furnace Company liable for loss allegedly resulting from improper use of corporate funds to purchase shares of the company. Because a meaningful decision upon review turns upon a complete understanding of the factual background, a somewhat detailed summary of the evidence is required.

Holland Furnace Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, manufactures warm air furnaces, air conditioning equipment, and other home heating equipemnt. At the time of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  2. Bennett v. ProppSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  3. Kors v. CareyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  4. Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Korsn v. CareyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Johnson v. TruebloodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,297 Charles Heit v. Walter S. BairdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API