Legal Opinion

Wetterau, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1992No. 1695 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

Wetterau, Inc., the employer, appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which reversed the decision of a referee dismissing both a reinstatement petition and a review petition filed by the claimant, John Mihaljevich. As we believe the Board erred, we must reverse its order and reinstate the order of the referee.

In 1984, while working for the émployer as a warehouseman, the claimant injured his ankle. Surgery to repair the iry'ured ankle was performed by Dr. Scott Baron in January of 1985. The claimant collected benefits for total…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Wilkes-Barre, City v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Stonebraker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Paxos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. G & B Packing v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API