Legal Opinion

Amis Construction Co. v. Pressed Steel Tank Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 16, 1968No. 65-C-168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved to transfer this action to the western district of Oklahoma pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiffs sue for damages allegedly caused to a pumping station in Oklahoma and contend that such damage was caused by the escape of liquid chlorine through a defective weld in a steel pressure vessel manufactured by the defendants, Pressed Steel Tank Company.

*85Plaintiffs originally brought an action arising out of the same facts and circumstances in the United States district court for the western district of Oklahoma, but that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harry Rich Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. American Optical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
  3. McGraw-Edison Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  4. Goldsberry v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  5. Smith v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API