Legal Opinion

Spine v. Biedermann Motech Gmbh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-1827Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STRYKER SPINE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08–1827 (CKK) BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 16, 2010) This case involves a dispute between Plaintiff Stryker Spine (“Stryker”), a French corporation, and Defendants Biedermann Motech GmbH (“Biedermann”) and DePuy Spine, Inc. (“DePuy”), over a patent interference proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Stryker seeks judicial review of decisions made by the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences pursuant to 35…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API