Legal Opinion · Concurrence

National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1941No. 9209Published

1ConcurrenceDenman, Circuit Judge

My brethren are of the opinion that where such an administrative body as the National Labor Relations Board, upon a further hearing on matters recommitted to it, decides there is ho ground-to sustain its charges of employer domination of a union or of other unfair labor practices, and asks to have set aside its own orders, including one destroying an absent union’s right of collective bargaining, that is an adequate reason for a decree granting its request. I am in agreement with this, but prefer to concur on the additional ground of the lack of jurisdiction in personam over the Association…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API