Legal Opinion

Maury v. Talmadge

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided July 15, 1840PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[This was an action for damages for personal injury by M. T. Maury against Talmadge.]

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action was brought to recover damages for the upsetting of the defendant’s stage, in 1839. in which the plaintiff, being a passenger, was much injured. The upset was near Somerset, on the route from Chillieothe to Zanesville; and is charged to have been caused ■ by the want of skill, and negligence in the driver, overloading the stage, and want of lights. Plea, not guilty. The plaintiff offered evidence to prove that, at Maysville, in Kentucky. the southern terminus of the route, a special contract was made with the agent of the defendant, by the passengers, that not…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Frink v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Sanderson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Budd v. United Carriage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API