Cowell v. Builders, Incorp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Parker, J.,
In this action in assumpsit brought to recover a balance claimed to be due for wages, a trial judge sitting without a jury found for the defendant. A motion for a new trial was refused by the court and plaintiff has appealed to this court. The opinion of the learned judge of the court below fully sustains the conclusion reached.
The statement of claim alleged that Henry Cowell performed skilled labor at the instance and request of defendant for the agreed price of $1.20 per hour but was paid at a less rate. The affidavit of defense admitted the employment and service but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Allen v. Tuscarora Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Kennedy's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Nuebling to Use v. Topton Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cohen v. MarianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Craft Engineering Co. v. MessaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Fritz v. LyonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958