Legal Opinion

Taber v. Skulicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion and cross motion granted and complaint and cross claims dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendants Kristen A. Skulicz and Daniel T. Skulicz and the cross motion of the remaining defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims. Defendants met their initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The only proof in admissible form submitted by plaintiff in opposition is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. McKnight v. La-ValleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Stowell v. SafeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Thousand v. HedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cantave v. GelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Lumpkins v. KendrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Mercado v. GarbaczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API