Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1991No. C1-90-2647PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellant William Harris was convicted of attempted first degree murder, first degree assault, and two counts of second degree assault. This court affirmed .his conviction. State v. Harris, 407 N.W.2d 456 (Minn.App.1987), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. July 31, 1987). In July 1990 Harris filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief. Harris also petitioned for appointment of counsel to represent him in the postconviction proceeding. The trial court denied the petitions without an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The jury convicted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Fratzke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Garasha v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. EdgarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Berg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Kenneth E. Murray v. Sheryl Ramstad HvassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Kenneth E. Murray v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Kenneth E. Murray v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API