Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Smrha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1936No. 29874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a suit in equity to enjoin the director of insurance and the treasurer of the state of Nebraska from enforcing the provisions of chapter 99, Laws 1935, for the reason that the act is unconstitutional. The trial court held the act to be unconstitutional and appellants thereupon perfected their appeal to this court.

The act in substance provides that every fire insurance company now or hereafter engaging in or carrying on business in this state shall pay to the state treasurer annually a tax equal to 2 per cent, of the gross fire premium receipts, after deducting return premiums and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pacific Express Co. v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wheeler v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Taylor v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Selden v. BerkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smrha v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hassler v. EngbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. McNeilNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Thorin v. BurkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. City of Louisville v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API