Pitschman v. Oman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Main, J. —
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that there was no liability as to the defendants G. W. Emerton and wife, but that recovery could be had against the defendants N. P. Oman and wife in the sum of seventeen hundred dollars. Judgment was entered dismissing the case as to Emerton and wife and entering a judgment against Oman and wife in the sum mentioned, from which they appeal.
The accident out of which the litigation arose happened June 8, 1931,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Craig v. McAteeWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Klopfenstein v. EadsWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Dawson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. TreatWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Arnhold v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958
- Edith Peterson v. Marie ExumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Edith Peterson v. Marie ExumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Miller v. TreatWashington Supreme Court · 1960