Knott v. WASHINGTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ETC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in finding that plaintiff had an easement along Cherry’s Alley to Washington Street. We disagree and find that the evidence does show that plaintiff had an implied easement in the alley.
Although easements must generally be created in writing, courts will find the existence of an easement by implication under certain circumstances. J. Webster, Real Estate Law in North Carolina, § 280 at 346 (1971). Easements are implied in two basic situations. In the first, an “easement by necessity” may be found, typically when land becomes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Huff v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Dorman v. Wayah Valley Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- CDC Pineville, LLC v. UDRT of North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Curd v. WinecoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Metts v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Tedder v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.