Legal Opinion

People v. McKissack

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1968No. Crim. 13083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

An information charging defendant with one count of forgery. (Pen. Code, § 470) consolidated for trial with an information charging his brother Reece Ray McKissaek with four counts of forgery, became count V of the consolidated information. A jury found defendant guilty of forgery as charged in count V; Reece Ray McKissack was found guilty on counts I, II, III and IV. Only defendant appeals from the judgment.

The charge against defendant (count V) involves Exhibit 5, a cheek drawn on First Western Bank and Trust Company of Alhambra, California, personalized for Laddercraft Company, dated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. MehaffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. CrookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. SaterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Carter v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. State v. RockerfellerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Daniel Mora Mendoza v. W.J. SullivanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API