Legal Opinion

People v. Saterfield

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1967No. Crim. 10126PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

This is an automatic appeal (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b)) from a judgment entered pursuant to jury verdicts finding defendant guilty of two counts of first degree murder and fixing the penalty at death on each count.

Although defendant does not complain of the fact, the prosecution introduced in evidence two incriminating statements he made to the police after warnings as to his constitutional rights which complied with People v. Dorado (1965) 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361]; in view of our holding in People v. Rollins (1967) ante, p. 681 [56 Cal.Rptr. 293, 423 P.2d 221], that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API