People v. Singh
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Defendants were convicted by jury of multiple felonies. They have raised various claims on appeal and by petitions for writs of habeas corpus. Their primary complaints involve challenges to the sufficiency of evidence; inadequacy of jury instructions; admission of expert testimony, “profile” and “other crimes” evidence; the failure to sever the cases against each for trial; and matters of sentencing. We reject all claims except those relating to sentencing and restitution, which will require preparation of amended abstracts of judgment by the trial court. Otherwise, the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Obigbo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- Kinney v. CSB Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. GillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. WitcraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.