Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Stuart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1976No. 46851PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice.

Appellant, Robert Terry Stuart, Jr., filed an application to terminate alimony payments on the ground that the Appellee, Beatrice Carr Stuart, had remarried and that Appellee had not made application to the court within ninety days thereafter for a determination that support was still needed and that circumstances had not rendered payment of the same inequitable. The trial court overruled the application of the Appellant to terminate support payments by reason of Appellee’s remarriage on the ground that the decree of divorce was a consent judgment which could not be modified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Butler v. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Clement v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. May v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Whitehead v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Allgood v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Holleyman v. HolleymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Ettinger v. EttingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API