Bluebonnet Sayings Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This case is before the court following a trial on the merits on the issue of damages. In a previous decision on the issue of liability, Chief Judge Smith held that the passage of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (FIRREA), and its implementing regulations and related agency actions, breached the capital plan, subordinated debenture (subordinated debt) and div*158idend forbearances granted to plaintiffs James M. Fail, Stone Capital, Inc.,1 and Bluebonnet Savings Bank (Bluebonnet) in an Assistance Agreement…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Arizona ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., and Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, f.s.b. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.