Legal Opinion
Paasch v. Estate of Vogel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
It appears that Frank Sommerfeldt loaned Paul Vogel $800. Some time later, evidently in the neighborhood of three weeks, a note was given to Sommerfeldt in the following form :
“Burlington Wise. 1945
“.after date I promise to pay to the order of
Frank Sommerfeldt eight hundred dollars $800 dollars at Silver Lake, Wis.
“Value received with interest at 4% per annum after date until paid.
“Paul Vogel
“No. Due Wm X Vogel. “Rose Vogel”
The evidence sustains the objection interposed by the executor, to wit: “. . . that said claim is not a valid claim against the estate of William Vogel, deceased; that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Adams v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Odell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- United Parcel Service v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Sheldon v. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver of Community Savings & Loan Association v. Peter JuergensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Perry v. RiskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- United States Treasury Department v. La Crosse Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955