Legal Opinion

Adams v. Adams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

On behalf of the plaintiff it is contended, first, that the findings of the court are against the clear preponderance of the evidence; second, that the findings are insufficient to support the judgment; and third, that *524the plaintiff is entitled to the custody of the child. The record in this case does not make pleasant reading, and the state of the evidence is such that a determination by the trial court either way upon the evidence could not be disturbed. Whatever our determination might be if the evidence were before us as an original proposition, we cannot say that the determination of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dietz v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cointe v. Congregation of St. John the BaptistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Penn v. PennWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Larson v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hamachek v. HamachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In Matter of Adoption of RPRWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API