Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. SunTrust Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 2016No. 2d Civil B264541PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYegan, J.
Rather than giving full faith and credit to a South Carolina foreclosure judgment, appellant contends that we should give it no faith and no credit. This would require riding roughshod over Article IV, § 1 of the United States Constitution, section 1913, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and time honored principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. 1 There is no principled reason to do so.
*683 Flordeliza Hawkins appeals from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor SunTrust Bank (SunTrust), a Georgia state chartered bank, on her complaint for wrongful…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. IoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Guarantee Forklift, Inc. v. Capacity of Texas, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Blizzard Energy, Inc. v. SchaefersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Casey v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Casey v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.