Legal Opinion

Pew v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 28, 2014No. 109,672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schroeder, J.:

Floyd W. Pew and 66 other members of the Kansas Sexual Predator Treatment Program (collectively referred to as Residents) appeal the district court’s summary dismissal of their writ of habeas corpus challenging the program’s decision to restrict their right to purchase consumable items to only three vendors. Management of the Kansas Sexual Predator Treatment Program has failed to show its restricted vendor policy has a treatment or security-related basis. We therefore remand for the appointment of counsel and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Facts

Petitions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Merrifield v. COUNTY COM'RS FOR COUNTY OF SANTA FECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Thomas B. Cross v. David W. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Murphy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Chiles v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chubb v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  2. Merryfield v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API