City of Andover v. Southwestern Bell Telepnone, L.P.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
We consider here an order denying arbitration of a claim of the City of Andover (Andover) against Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. (SWBT). Andover sued SWBT, alleging that the phone company’s negligence in not promptly locating its buried cables forced the city into later making a contract with SWBT to move those cables. SWBT successfully moved the cables and was paid for its work. But the parties’ contract had an arbitration clause and, when sued by Andover, SWBT unsuccessfully sought arbitra tion of the claim. We hold that the district court properly refused to compel arbitration…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Horton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Reynolds v. Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- In Re Del CampoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- PCTV Gold, Inc. v. SPEEDNET, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Hemphill v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Cohen v. BattagliaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Midwest Asphalt Coating, Inc. v. Chelsea Plaza Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Paradigm Alliance, Inc. v. Celeritas Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.