Legal Opinion

Midwest Asphalt Coating, Inc. v. Chelsea Plaza Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 23, 2010No. 103,973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

Midwest Asphalt Coating, Inc. (Midwest), appeals the district court’s denial of its request for attorney fees and costs. We affirm.

Midwest contends that it was entitled to attorney fees and costs under the terms of its contract with Chelsea Plaza Homes, Inc. (Chelsea Plaza), in quantum meruit, or under the Kansas Fairness in Private Construction Contract Act (FPCCA), K.S.A. 16-1801 et seq.

Facts

In August 2007, Chelsea Plaza took bids for repairs to a parking lot. Chelsea Plaza signed a contract with Midwest on October 4, 2007, for the repair work.

Before the work was completed,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindsey Masonry Co. v. Murray & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  2. EST Inc. v. Royal-Grow Products, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  3. Haarslev, Inc. v. Tom's Metal Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  4. In re Estate of RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. Kurt v. Platinum Supplemental Insurance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API