Legal Opinion
Hemphill v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided April 17, 2009No. 98,966PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
Mark and Monessa Hemphill filed suit against Ford Motor Company, Fenton Motors (a Ford dealer), and Daimler-Chrysler Services North America, LLC (a car-financing entity doing business as “Chrysler Financial”) for claims arising from the Hemphills’ purchase of a Ford Mustang convertible. The purchase was financed through an agreement between the Hemphills, Fen-ton Motors, and Chrysler Financial, and the finance agreement contained an arbitration clause. When the Hemphills filed suit, all three defendants moved to compel arbitration, and the district court granted that motion and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. Rhone Poulenc Fiber and Resin Intermediates, S.A.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Uhlmann v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Coulter v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Hutton & Hutton Law Firm, LLC v. Girardi & KeeseDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Heartland Presbytery v. The Presbyterian Church of Stanley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.