Philip Sieden v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRAND, District Judge.
Philip Sieden appeals the district court’s 2 grant of summary judgment in favor of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Chi-potle), on his reprisal claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA). The district court found that Sieden failed as a matter of law to establish that his employer’s proffered reason for discharge was pretextual. We affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
Chipotle operates a national chain of restaurants with multiple locations in Minnesota. Each restaurant is managed by a general manager who reports to an area manager. Above the area managers are team directors. During…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Robert E. Erickson v. Farmland Industries, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Daniel Gardner v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Lund-Ross Constructors, Inc. v. Jay BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Fed. Ins. Co. v. COR Clearing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2018
- Beloate v. DejoyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- Boyd v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.