Legal Opinion
D'ORO v. D'Oro
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
187 N.J. Super. 377 (1982)
454 A.2d 915
ANNETTE M. D'ORO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANK J. D'ORO, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Bergen County.
Decided November 9, 1982.
George J. Cotz for plaintiff (Weber, Muth & Weber, attorneys).
Rose Marie C. Schutt for defendant (Messineo & Messineo, attorneys).
KRAFTE, J.J.D.R.C. (temporarily assigned).
In the ever-burgeoning field of matrimonial division of pensions, a problem, apparently for which no precedent has been found, arises in this post-judgment motion. As aptly put by Judge Consodine in In re Finkelstein, 112 N.J. Super. 534, 537…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kikkert v. KikkertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Kikkert v. KikkertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- In Re FinkelsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
3Cited by11 opinions
- Innes v. InnesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Steneken v. StenekenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Mayville v. MayvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- D'Oro v. D'OroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Pelot v. PelotCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.