Legal Opinion

Steneken v. Steneken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 18, 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal requires that we address whether, in setting an award of alimony and in establishing equitable distribution in respect of a closely-held corporation, the trial court must use the same income determination. As differently posed by defendant, the question is whether it is impermissible “double counting” to use actual income for alimony purposes but a lower “normalized” income amount when valuing a closely-held business for equitable distribution purposes.

We hold that a trial court’s determination of the interplay between an alimony award and equitable distribution is subject to an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Innes v. InnesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. JacobyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  2. J.E.V. v. K.V.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  3. Clark v. ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. M.G. v. S.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API