Legal Opinion

Pelot v. Pelot

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 22, 1983No. 82-1535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Edmund Pelot appeals from an order reducing maintenance payable to Maxine Pelot. We hold that the trial court improperly treated Edmund’s pension as income. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

When the divorce was granted in 1979, the trial court ordered Edmund to pay $450 alimony and $200 support per month, and divided the marital estate, about $48,047 to Edmund and $43,156 to Maxine. As part of the property division, the court assigned to Edmund $2,260 in bank accounts and life insurance cash values, a $20,600 lien on the home, and his interest in his union pension fund,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Carlson Heating, Inc. v. OnchuckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Bahr v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Pinkowski v. PinkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In RE MARRIAGE OF HOMMEL v. HommelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In RE MARRIAGE OF OLSKI v. OlskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Marriage of McReath v. McReathWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API