Legal Opinion
Keet v. Murrin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except MeNamee, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the admission of the evidence that the defendant “ settled ” with a witness, who had a corresponding claim against the defendant, was erroneous and prejudicial.
2Cited by5 opinions
- City of Coral Gables v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Woodland v. CoteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Goldstein v. Albany Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Schenker v. BourneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Cavalier v. BittnerNew York Supreme Court · 1946