Legal Opinion
Holland v. Lovelace
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided December 17, 2011No. 05-09-00993-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice LANG-MIERS.
Appellant Kim Holland, in her capacity as Receiver of Petrosurance Casualty Company (PCC), brought this suit for damages against three former PCC officers and PCC’s auditors and consultants. After a five-week jury trial, the trial court signed a judgment awarding Holland $30,000 in damages against appellees Charles Ray Lovelace, Robert Carlin Lee> and Richard Wayne Miller (together, the Officers). The trial court’s judgment also provided that Holland take nothing from appellee Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP (MHM). For the following reasons, we affirm…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- in Re: Zimmer, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- White, Larry and VSC LLC v. Harrison, Mike, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
- Examination Management Services, Inc. v. Kersh Risk Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. v. the Guarantee Company of North America, USA, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- City of Justin, Texas v. Rimrock Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.