Legal Opinion

State v. Galanes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 12, 2015No. 14-351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

Dooley, J.

Defendant appeals an order of the Windham Superior Court1 concluding that he violated a condition of his probation requiring him to notify his probation officer if he is planning to begin a sexual relationship. We reverse.

¶ 2. On October 29, 2009, defendant was convicted of several felony and misdemeanor offenses and placed on probation. In August 2013, after two separate probation violations in 2010 and 2013, defendant was placed on stricter conditions regárding sexual relationships. Included in defendant’s list of conditions was Condition 45, which states:

You must inform your…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. McVey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. State v. SanvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Patricia KaneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. State v. Bryan L. PerraultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. State v. Darryl M. GallowaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. State v. Austin R. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. State v. Austin R. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API