Legal Opinion
Levy v. Edmund Buick-Pontiac, Ltd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 15, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
270 N.J. Super. 563 (1993)
637 A.2d 600
THEODORE LEVY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDMUND BUICK-PONTIAC, LTD., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Special Civil Part, Essex County.
Decided October 15, 1993.
Theodore Levy, Plaintiff Pro Se.
Thomas R. Duthie, II, for Defendant.
FAST, J.S.C.
Plaintiff, Theodore Levy, moved to file an amended complaint to recover from the defendant, Edmund Buick-Pontiac, Ltd., treble damages under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-19, as well as for compensatory damages (as sought in the original complaint). Plaintiff, the assignee of this claim, asserts that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daaleman v. Elizabethtown Gas CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Neveroski v. BlairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Skeer v. EMK Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Ramanadham v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Delaware Savings Bank FSBDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Nationwide Mutual Ins. v. CarisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011