Legal Opinion
State v. Domian
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 2, 1996No. 15154PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The sole issue presented by this certified appeal is whether the guilty plea of the defendant, Karol Domian, was entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently, notwithstanding the trial court’s failure to inform him of the mandatory minimum sentence. The defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of arson in the first degree,1 a class A felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of not less than ten nor more than twenty-five years,2 and was sentenced to a prison term of ten years. The defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction to the Appellate Court claiming that the trial court’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. IralaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.