Legal Opinion

Cameron v. City of Bank of York

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1925No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The Commissioner of Banking, now Secretary of Banking, assumed possession of the State Bank of York, Pa., because of its insolvency, and proceeded, under the law, to administer its affairs. He filed an account with a schedule of distribution, which was excepted to by various creditors, and, upon disposition of these exceptions, distribution was ordered, to which order the Secretary of Banking, alone, took exception, and, from the final decree confirming it, he alone has appealed.

Neither appellant nor the Commonwealth has any legal interest in the decree of distribution from which…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mellon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Cameron v. Carnegie Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Musser's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. York v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API