Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Carnegie Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1928No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The Ottumwa National Bank, appellant, sent to the Carnegie Trust Company a note for collection and remittance only. The bank was not a depositor of the trust company, and the latter institution was then insolvent, a fact which did not become known to the bank until after the secretary of banking had taken possession of the trust company’s assets, as hereinafter set forth. Despite the fact of its insolvency, the trust company accepted the note, received its amount in cash, mingled the sum so received with its other funds, and sent to the bank a draft on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Vosburgh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Webb v. NewhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Bauer v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Lebanon Trust & Safe Deposit Bank's Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mehler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Trestrail v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Erie Trust Company's Case (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Ging v. Parker-Hunter Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Main Belting Co. v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API