Legal Opinion
Seaton Ranch Co. v. Montana Vegetable Oil & Feed Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1952No. 9087PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:
This action is to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff as a result of the death of certain sheep from eating oil cake pellets manufactured by defendant from grain and mustard seed screenings and sold to plaintiff.
This is the second trial of the case. The jury found for plaintiff in the first trial and for error in the giving of certain instructions the case was remanded for a new trial. Seaton Ranch Co. v. Montana Vegetable Oil & Feed Co., 123 Mont. 396, 217 Pac. (2d) 549. In the second trial the jury again found for plaintiff in the sum of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Kelley v. John R. Daily Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- Bolitho v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1952
- Seaton Ranch Co. v. Montana Vegetable Oil & Feed Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bos v. DolajakMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Dunn v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- George L. White v. Coy H. Rose, Also Known as Coy N. Rose, Individually, and Doing Business as Rose Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- George L. White v. Coy H. Rose, Also Known as Coy N. Rose, Individually, and Doing Business as Rose Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Seaton Ranch Co. v. Montana Vegetable Oil & Feed Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1952