Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. S & a Chaissan & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1978No. 77 Civ. 816, 77 Civ. 817 and 77 Civ. 818. (HFW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
I
The migrant farmworker plaintiffs in these consolidated actions seek to vindicate certain statutory and common law rights which they allege were infringed by the defendants, apple growers and associations of apple growers in the Hudson Valley and certain of their officers and shareholders. Plaintiffs assert that they are entitled to declaratory and equitable relief as well as money damages for the defendants’ denial of their rights under the Wagner-Peyser Act of 1933, 29 U.S.C. § 49 et seq. (hereinafter “the Wagner-Peyser Act”) and its regulations and common law…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Antonia Montelongo, Cross-Appellants v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General, Glen Martin, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Leonardo Espinoza, Maria Espinoza, Guadalupe Espinoza, Juan Garcia, Amada Garcia, Nestor Garcia v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.