State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, J.:
Michael L. Martin, defendant, appeals the district court’s finding that, as a matter of law, he could not serve the 90 days of imprisonment required under K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 8-1567(f) in a work release facility. We affirm.
The facts in this case are undisputed. On November 7, 1988, Martin entered a plea of guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), contrary to K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 8-1567. This conviction was the defendant’s third DUI conviction within a five-year period. On November 16, 1988, Martin appeared for sentencing. The district court sentenced Martin to 6 months in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Citizens State Bank of Grainfield v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
- State v. MeredithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ScherzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. UrbanekCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- State v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001