Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 22, 1989No. 63,347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, J.:

Michael L. Martin, defendant, appeals the district court’s finding that, as a matter of law, he could not serve the 90 days of imprisonment required under K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 8-1567(f) in a work release facility. We affirm.

The facts in this case are undisputed. On November 7, 1988, Martin entered a plea of guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), contrary to K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 8-1567. This conviction was the defendant’s third DUI conviction within a five-year period. On November 16, 1988, Martin appeared for sentencing. The district court sentenced Martin to 6 months in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Citizens State Bank of Grainfield v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  4. State v. MeredithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ScherzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. State v. UrbanekCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  3. State v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993
  5. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API