Legal Opinion

State v. Urbanek

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 21, 1990No. 64,978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

This case concerns an apparent discrepancy between two statutes, K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 8-1567(e) and K.S.A. 21-4614. The issue involved is whether the trial cburt erred in requiring that defendant Stephanie Urbanek serve five'consecutive days in jail, as required by 8-1567(e), thereby denying her jail time credit, as contemplated by 21-4614, for the approximately three days she spent in jail prior to posting bond.

The facts are not complicated, are not in dispute, and will be discussed only briefly. Suffice it to say that defendant was arrested in Shawnee County on August 12, 1989, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. State v. DubishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MastersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. State v. CalvertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. WolvertonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. CalvertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API