Legal Opinion

City of Little Rock v. Tibbett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1990No. CR 89-182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This attempted appeal by the City of Little Rock on behalf of the State of Arkansas must be dismissed for noncompliance with Rule 36.10 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Harold Tibbett, appellee, was charged with driving while intoxicated, having no liability insurance and failure to produce a driver’s license. He appealed from his convictions in the Little Rock Municipal Court and moved in circuit court to dismiss on the contention that the charges against him were brought only by the arresting officer, whose actions were invalid because of a failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Grable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. State v. TiptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. State v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Warren v. WheatleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. State v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API