Legal Opinion
Forrand v. Foodmaker, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1986No. B006084PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
After a jury trial, the negligence of defendant/appellant Foodmaker, Inc., doing business as Jack-in-the-Box (appellant), was found to have been the sole cause of injuries sustained by plaintiff/respondent Keith W. Forrand (respondent). To have reached this verdict, the jury believed the following to be true:
On July 17, 1977, at approximately 6:50 a.m., Glenn Dore (Dore) a 15-year-old runaway, committed an armed robbery against appellant Jack-in- the-Box restaurant. He knocked on the drive-through window; and when Michelle Laberteaux (Laberteaux), the shift manager,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Cohen v. Southland Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nevarez v. Thriftimart, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morris v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Seibert Security Services, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Robertson v. WentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hassoon v. ShamiehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.