Legal Opinion

Levine v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 199, 200, and 201Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Cylvia, Esther, and Bernard Levine instituted an action in trespass against the Pittsburgh Railways Company, hereinafter called the Company, to recover damages resulting from a collision between Cylvia’s automobile and the Company’s trolley. Cylvia was the bailor of the car, Bernard was the operator, and Esther, Bernard’s wife, was a passenger. Upon petition of the Company, the parties plaintiff were severed, and Bernard was joined as an additional defendant in the actions of Cylvia and Esther. At the trial, the jury returned a verdict for Bernard in his individual…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peden v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Harris v. DeFeliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Koren v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. McClintock v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API